Sharon's Choice
I've always known that I didn't
want to have children. My mom remembers hearing me say unequivocally, when I
was about ten, that I didn't want children. Remaining childless has been a
conscious choice in many ways, but it has also been merely staying true to
myself.
This doesn't mean I hate
children. Granted, if given the choice to socialize with children, adults, or a
mix of both, I'll take option B every time. But I don't hate children. They can
be quite entertaining and surprising sometimes.
I simply do not ever wish to be completely
responsible for someone else's existence in the exigent way that parenthood
requires.
When I was first married, people
often asked me when I was going to start having children, in that sure way
people use when the have already assumed an answer. My responses ranged from enigmatic (we're not
really planning) to hostile (what if I can't? what then??!!).
One of the few positives about
being a woman over 40 is that few people inquire anymore about our plans to
start a family. Though I do occasionally get the grimaced-faced,
pseudo-concerned "do you ever regret not having kids?"
Burying my interlocutor in a laundry
list of our travels, hobbies, and accomplishments usually wipes the creases from their faux-furrowed
brow.
However, let me say this: I have
nothing but the highest esteem and respect for people who willingly (or not)
undertake parenthood and then dedicate themselves to the job. Many of my
friends and most of my family members are exceptional parents with kind,
generous, intelligent kids.
Regina, the newest addition to
our ESOL class, has a daughter who is across the country for her first year of
college. I asked if her daughter had been home for the Thanksgiving holiday.
"No," she said.
"But she will be for Christmas, for the break."
"How long will she be
home?" I asked.
"She will spend two weeks
with us," Regina replied. "And then she will go to Korea. To see her
boyfriend."
Van and I, the only two other
people attending class this week, looked at each other and raised our eyebrows.
Van's toothy grin widened.
"Wow," Van said.
"You're really nice mom. You let her go away for two weeks with her
boyfriend? Without you?"
All three of us laughed. I knew
we were a little too loud for the room we were in, with its half walls that
opened to the high ceiling of the main library's ground floor, allowing our
laughter to rain down on the motley men silently cruising the web on computers
just outside our door. But I didn't care. Our conversation had taken such a
surprising and interesting turn. Once again, after having to force myself to
come to our class, I was happy I had.
Regina sobered first.
"She will stay with my
mother," she said, touching her hand to her chest.
"Ah," I said.
"With grandma."
Regina nodded.
"Is grandma…" I
hesitated, searching for the right word. "Permissive?"
Van and I exchanged a mischievous
and knowing look.
Regina's brow remained smooth as
she quite matter-of-factly replied, "Yes, quite permissive."
"Wow." This time the
astonishment was mine. "That's a lot of trust there," I said.
"Yes," Regina replied.
Our conversation then migrated
through whether Van would like to have children (her answer, in typical Van
pragmatism: "maybe, if it's not too late"), and on to more specifics
about whether or not the pain of childbirth is "worth it" (Regina's
quietly certain answer: "Yes." Neither of us had any way to argue.)
If only two people were supposed
to show up for my class last night, I am very happy the two were Van and
Regina. Van and I got to chat casually for a while about stories and books we
read as adolescents before Regina came in. She is much more expressive and
dynamic in one-on-one conversation than in a group. I do worry a little,
however, about her lack of interest in her own life. And Regina is a great
addition to our group, with her lilting laugh and cultured manner. I look
forward to learning more about her as we move into the New Year.
We ended class a little early,
partly because the conversational momentum of only three people is finite, and
partly because my husband was waiting for me and we had dinner plans. The end
came naturally, though, at a lull in our talking, and we all seemed to know it before
I called it.
Later, after dinner and drinks
and more conversation and laughter, in the quiet of a sleeping house, I
examined once more my status as a childless woman. I don't really like that
term, with its inherent negativity (less than what, exactly?). The only alternative I've heard, though, is so
clumsy and alliterative in a painfully self-aware way as to be embarrassing: childless by choice. As if I felt the
need to explicitly separate myself from those poor unfortunate women who had
always wanted children, perhaps desperately so, but whose biology conspired
against them. Why do we have these ridiculous monikers, anyway? Why do we
constantly feel the need to define ourselves to others? Are we doing it for the
sake of the others, or for ourselves?
Regardless, I'm done with it. The
defining ad nauseum, that is. The
other positive I've discovered about being over 40 is a waning desire to be
popular or liked by people I don't know. Those who know me get it; those who don't
will either figure it out or leave. Sharonless
by choice, I call them. And above all, I respect their choice.
Comments
Post a Comment